In the Bible, and in the book of Job specifically, there are
great creatures depicted that seem to be describing dinosaurs. Dinosaurs, according to the theory of
evolution, lived billions of years ago in some distant past and disappeared long
before any humans came on the scene.
Yet, we keep finding evidences that man and dinosaurs coexisted just as
the Bible said.
The reason for the denial of coexistence comes from a man named Charles Lyell, a lawyer who set about to remove science and history from the Bible. He postulated what is now known as the geologic column. The geologic column is what most science uses as a gauge to age what is found buried in the ground. They say they can tell the age of the rocks by the fossils found in them, and know the age of the fossils by the rocks they are found in; circular logic that makes no sense.
In more modern times science has come up with radiometric dating to date fossils and thus the age of the rocks they are found in. There are a lot of assumptions made to make this work. The samples would have to have been uncontaminated, and the parent element must have been the only one present at the time the rock was formed. Neither of those assumptions are accurate in the real world though. Contamination happens in the real world, and rocks are not birthed with only one element present. It is also very poor when dating sedimentary rock, which is where most fossils are found.
The bible says that there was a flood. This is evidence by the fact that you find most fossils in sedimentary layers. Fossils are only formed when they are quickly buried. The way fossils are formed, the amount of fossils and their sudden appearance coincide with a flood event. The fact we find fossils worldwide is also in line with a worldwide flood. Through scientific observation and experimentation it has been shown that many rock layers can be formed rapidly, not laid out slowly over millions of years.
The biggest evidences come from human artifacts themselves. It has only been in modern times that we have “discovered” dinosaurs, and only in more recent times have we come to recognize the many different kinds and what they might have looked like… or so we think. Yet, cultures and peoples of the past have left evidences of dinosaurs, pictured accurately with what we now know them to look like, hundreds, and even thousands of years before dinosaurs were “discovered”.
So, how do we get an accurate picture of a stegosaurus on a Cambodian Temple hundreds of years before dino’s were discovered?
http://fallenangels.ning.com/photo/stegasarus-1?xg_source=activity#!/photo/cambodian-temple-with?context=user
How come we find dinosaurs accurately portrayed on the burial stones of ancient Peruvians?
http://www.crystalinks.com/icadinofish.jpg
Why do we find accurate clay figurines of dinosaurs in Mexico that date to 2500 BC?
http://thecryptozoologist.webs.com/apps/blog/show/21162500-compelling-evidence-that-dinosaurs-and-humans-coexisted-
The reason for the denial of coexistence comes from a man named Charles Lyell, a lawyer who set about to remove science and history from the Bible. He postulated what is now known as the geologic column. The geologic column is what most science uses as a gauge to age what is found buried in the ground. They say they can tell the age of the rocks by the fossils found in them, and know the age of the fossils by the rocks they are found in; circular logic that makes no sense.
In more modern times science has come up with radiometric dating to date fossils and thus the age of the rocks they are found in. There are a lot of assumptions made to make this work. The samples would have to have been uncontaminated, and the parent element must have been the only one present at the time the rock was formed. Neither of those assumptions are accurate in the real world though. Contamination happens in the real world, and rocks are not birthed with only one element present. It is also very poor when dating sedimentary rock, which is where most fossils are found.
The bible says that there was a flood. This is evidence by the fact that you find most fossils in sedimentary layers. Fossils are only formed when they are quickly buried. The way fossils are formed, the amount of fossils and their sudden appearance coincide with a flood event. The fact we find fossils worldwide is also in line with a worldwide flood. Through scientific observation and experimentation it has been shown that many rock layers can be formed rapidly, not laid out slowly over millions of years.
The biggest evidences come from human artifacts themselves. It has only been in modern times that we have “discovered” dinosaurs, and only in more recent times have we come to recognize the many different kinds and what they might have looked like… or so we think. Yet, cultures and peoples of the past have left evidences of dinosaurs, pictured accurately with what we now know them to look like, hundreds, and even thousands of years before dinosaurs were “discovered”.
So, how do we get an accurate picture of a stegosaurus on a Cambodian Temple hundreds of years before dino’s were discovered?
http://fallenangels.ning.com/photo/stegasarus-1?xg_source=activity#!/photo/cambodian-temple-with?context=user
How come we find dinosaurs accurately portrayed on the burial stones of ancient Peruvians?
http://www.crystalinks.com/icadinofish.jpg
Why do we find accurate clay figurines of dinosaurs in Mexico that date to 2500 BC?
http://thecryptozoologist.webs.com/apps/blog/show/21162500-compelling-evidence-that-dinosaurs-and-humans-coexisted-
We find these things all over the world and in many
different cultures.
http://sheperdmoonlight.wordpress.com/2011/01/07/dino-ancient-dinosaur-depictions/
http://sheperdmoonlight.wordpress.com/2011/01/07/dino-ancient-dinosaur-depictions/
We also have the accounts of dragons, that when examined in
their descriptions, are dinosaurs. To be
able to describe these creatures, they had to have been seen by humans as they
were “undiscovered” in the fossil form during those times.
http://www.nwcreation.net/dinosdragons.html
http://www.nwcreation.net/dinosdragons.html
Most scientists today totally dismiss these ideas as they are certain that their evolutionary model is the right one. They put these accounts into the realms of mythology so they can be easily dismissed, and anyone who endeavors to research such things is labeled a crackpot. Science has been wrong before and could be again concerning the dinosaur coexistence with man. The evidence is overwhelming that humans have seen and accurately pictured these creatures for which there would have been no other way to know about them, except that they coexisted.
No comments:
Post a Comment